<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>contentious.com &#187; analysis</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.contentious.com/category/analysis/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.contentious.com</link>
	<description>Amy Gahran's news and musings on how we communicate in the online age.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 17:13:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
		<item>
		<title>AOL buys HuffPo: Susan Mernit on who will benefit, who&#8217;s next (maybe)</title>
		<link>http://www.contentious.com/2011/02/09/aol-buys-huffpo-susan-mernit-on-who-will-benefit-whos-next-maybe/</link>
		<comments>http://www.contentious.com/2011/02/09/aol-buys-huffpo-susan-mernit-on-who-will-benefit-whos-next-maybe/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Feb 2011 23:49:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Amy Gahran</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AOL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blogher]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Huffpost]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sexism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[women]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contentious.com/?p=3519</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Right now there&#8217;s lots of buzz about the latest big deal in the media business: AOL bought the Huffington Post for $315 million. Amid the flurry of reactions and speculations, my friend, colleague, and mentor Susan Mernit offered two observations I found especially intriguing&#8230; Mernit&#8217;s points: This is probably a good deal &#8212; for AOL. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Right now there&#8217;s lots of buzz about the latest big deal in the media business: <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/02/07/aol-huffington-post_n_819375.html">AOL bought the Huffington Post</a> for $315 million. Amid the flurry of reactions and speculations, my friend, colleague, and mentor <strong>Susan Mernit</strong> offered two observations I found especially intriguing&#8230;</p>
<p><span id="more-3519"></span>Mernit&#8217;s points:</p>
<ul>
<li><strong><a href="http://www.susanmernit.com/blog/2011/02/aol-to-buy-huffpo-for-315-mm.html">This is probably a good deal &#8212; for AOL</a>.</strong> &#8220;I think Arianna Huffington is shrewd enough to know that the deal is better for AOL &#8212; and hopefully, for her investors and staff &#8212; than it is for HuffPo per se. While moving onto the AOL backend will save thousands in hosting costs, and a unified ad sales team will put AOL almost back to the glory days of being a must-buy service in terms of additional ad revenue, that doesn&#8217;t mean HuffPo is going to be a better service because of this deal.&#8221;</li>
<li><a href="http://www.susanmernit.com/blog/2011/02/aol-buys-is-blogher-next.html"><strong>Is BlogHer next?</strong></a> &#8220;BlogHer fits [AOL CEO Tim] Armstrong&#8217;s model of running a series of great niche sites. And while AOL and HuffPot are good on news and gossip, they don&#8217;t have a smart Mom&#8217;s network, per se, which is one place where <a href="http://blogher.com">BlogHer</a> has taken control of the 25-60 female audience. &#8230;But most of all, an attempt to acquire BlogHer would be good business.  If Armstrong and AOL want to acquire not only great brands but strong teams, they can&#8217;t do better.&#8221;</li>
</ul>
<p><span style="line-height: 24px;">We&#8217;ll see what happens. </span></p>
<p><span style="line-height: 24px;">Meanwhile, from my perspective, I&#8217;d like to hope that now that Arianna Huffington is the new boss of TechCrunch editor Michael Arrington, maybe he might start curbing his tendency to be <a href="http://techcrunch.com/2010/08/28/women-in-tech-stop-blaming-me">such</a> a <a href="http://techcrunch.com/2010/08/28/women-in-tech-stop-blaming-me/">defensive jerk</a> regarding the underrepresentation of women in tech, and on panels at tech conferences.</span></p>
<p><span style="line-height: 24px;">Yeah, I know&#8230;.  dream on&#8230;</span></p>
<div name="googleone_share_1" style="position:relative;z-index:5;float: right; margin-left: 10px;"><g:plusone size="tall" count="1" href="http://www.contentious.com/2011/02/09/aol-buys-huffpo-susan-mernit-on-who-will-benefit-whos-next-maybe/"></g:plusone></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.contentious.com/2011/02/09/aol-buys-huffpo-susan-mernit-on-who-will-benefit-whos-next-maybe/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Many Eyes: Turning data into pictures</title>
		<link>http://www.contentious.com/2008/12/04/many-eyes-turning-data-into-pictures/</link>
		<comments>http://www.contentious.com/2008/12/04/many-eyes-turning-data-into-pictures/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 18:49:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Amy Gahran</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[storytelling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tools]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IBM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interactive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[many eyes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[platform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[visualization]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contentious.com/?p=2191</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Data is a key part of many stories. IBM&#8217;s Many Eyes is a free online library of tools that give you options for visually exploring all kinds of data &#8212; even for analyzing text documents. It also lets you share and embed your visualizations. You can upload your dataset to Many Eyes and apply various [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Data is a key part of many stories. IBM&#8217;s <a href="manyeyes.alphaworks.ibm.com/manyeyes/">Many Eyes</a> is a free online library of tools that give you options for visually exploring all kinds of data &#8212; even for analyzing text documents. It also lets you share and embed your visualizations.</p>
<p>You can upload your dataset to Many Eyes and apply various <a href="http://manyeyes.alphaworks.ibm.com/manyeyes/page/Visualization_Options.html">visualization types</a> to that data &#8212; kind of like using filters on images in Photoshop. You can customize your display.</p>
<p>Many Eyes is a useful tool not just for publishing information, but also for analyzing information to see what the story might be, or where the anomalies are.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s an interactive visualization I just created:</p>
<p><script type="text/javascript" src="http://manyeyes.alphaworks.ibm.com/manyeyes/visualizations/1d733638c2a011ddb156000255111976/comments/1d83ea00c2a011ddb156000255111976.js?width=400&#038;height=350"></script></p>
<p>Earlier on Poynter&#8217;s E-Media Tidbits I wrote about how you can use some Many Eyes tools like word tree for <a href="http://poynter.org/column.asp?id=31&amp;aid=146447">document anal<strong>ysis</strong></a><strong>.</strong></p>
<p><span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong>Many Eyes meet the New York Times:</strong></span> On Oct. 27 NYTimes.com launched its <a href="http://vizlab.nytimes.com/">Visualization Lab</a>, where anyone can create and share visual representations of selected datasets and information used by Times reporters.</p>
<p>Many Eyes is just one of the <a href="http://www.research.ibm.com/visual/projects.html">projects from IBM&#8217;s Visual Communication Lab</a>.</p>
<div name="googleone_share_1" style="position:relative;z-index:5;float: right; margin-left: 10px;"><g:plusone size="tall" count="1" href="http://www.contentious.com/2008/12/04/many-eyes-turning-data-into-pictures/"></g:plusone></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.contentious.com/2008/12/04/many-eyes-turning-data-into-pictures/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

