"Shireen Mitchell, the founder of Digital Sisters and a consultant on social media campaigns focused on women and minorities, said that the way in which people access the Internet should remain a part of the conversation about the digital divide.
â€œThe quality of what is available through cell only is limited access,â€ she said. â€œWe are moving in a positive direction about true cellphone usage and itâ€™s relevant to online access, but there are still some challenges ahead.â€
"Ms. Mitchell said organizations or government agencies that are eager to move everything online should consider that some cellphones might not be able to take full advantage of the Web."
"Web-first meant content would be published online before in the print edition, and that the organization should start thinking first about the web, though most didnâ€™t, regardless of what they were saying. When I say we must shift to a mobile-first strategy, Iâ€™m not talking about where content appears when, but about the priorities of the organization: what you place first in your thinking and acting.}
"Vision Mobile, an analysis and advisory firm, surveyed 401 mobile app developers, and found that developers have more Android experience than Apple iOS.
Visible says Android has passed Apple with developers because Google's developers kit costs less, and because Google has done a good job marketing its open source model. Further, Android phones are selling well now, so there's plenty of customers.
The gap between Apple and Android isn't that great, so Apple should hold its lead in apps for a while to come. And, most developers say they are developing for more than one platform at a time."
About the views Prince espoused in this article, George Kelly says:
"and the Internet is dead because it's a problematic platform that doesn't encourage the scarcity, control and mystique that he operated under with his Warner Brothers record deal back in the day."
Typical CJR pooh-pooing of anything new in journalism: "The databases have been an unexpected hit — so popular, in fact, that the siteâ€™s biggest initial splash has been not as a fountain of authoritative reporting and analysis, but as a resource for readers to do their own exploring. While that fact may be humbling for reporters, itâ€™s part of a â€œdata-as-journalismâ€ mentality that has become the Tribuneâ€™s most far-reaching calling card.
"The Tribuneâ€™s idealistic stance toward data has the whiff of a familiar claim: if we give the public raw information, people will take the initiative to make sense of it and put it in its proper context. In effect, they will do what journalists have historically done for them. But the scale on which this in fact happens is uncertain, and the inherent journalistic value of raw data remains unclear."
"This is a collection of mobile resources from Mike Reilley and the Poynter Institute's Regina McCombs, Dave Stanton and Damon Kiesow, as well as many others. A list of mobile reporting tools appears at the end of this page. Most apps are tailored to the iPhone but have versions available for many other smart phones, too.
Mobile Industry Reading"
"this is a paywall without a door: There appears to be no way to buy access to the magazine from within a web browser â€” either an individual article or the full issue. The push is all toward print and the magazineâ€™s iPad app. Is that a temporary shortfall, while Time figures out the best way to charge for web access? Or is it a sign publishers are concluding that the web is so problematic a platform for news-as-paid-content that theyâ€™re better off using it as a simple promotional platform for iPad apps and paper? Or to ask the zen question, is it really a paywall if thereâ€™s no way to pay?"