<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wrestling with Scribd&#8217;s fullscreen display</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.contentious.com/2010/01/04/wrestling-with-scribds-fullscreen-display/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.contentious.com/2010/01/04/wrestling-with-scribds-fullscreen-display/</link>
	<description>Amy Gahran's news and musings on how we communicate in the online age.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 16:36:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy</title>
		<link>http://www.contentious.com/2010/01/04/wrestling-with-scribds-fullscreen-display/comment-page-1/#comment-1230043</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 04:26:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contentious.com/?p=3069#comment-1230043</guid>
		<description>This isn&#039;t working in fullscreen on FF.  I&#039;m also having trouble with a Drupal site running scribd full screen on FF.  Works perfectly on Safari and Chrome though.  I  like the Scribd functionality personally for easy presentation to folks.  Just a quick click on the link, and they&#039;re there.  The less processing the better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This isn&#8217;t working in fullscreen on FF.  I&#8217;m also having trouble with a Drupal site running scribd full screen on FF.  Works perfectly on Safari and Chrome though.  I  like the Scribd functionality personally for easy presentation to folks.  Just a quick click on the link, and they&#8217;re there.  The less processing the better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Krzysztof</title>
		<link>http://www.contentious.com/2010/01/04/wrestling-with-scribds-fullscreen-display/comment-page-1/#comment-1229852</link>
		<dc:creator>Krzysztof</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 13:26:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contentious.com/?p=3069#comment-1229852</guid>
		<description>You may be interested in using Azouk - http://www.azouk.com to store your documents online.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You may be interested in using Azouk &#8211; <a href="http://www.azouk.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.azouk.com</a> to store your documents online.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amy Gahran</title>
		<link>http://www.contentious.com/2010/01/04/wrestling-with-scribds-fullscreen-display/comment-page-1/#comment-1229846</link>
		<dc:creator>Amy Gahran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 02:41:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contentious.com/?p=3069#comment-1229846</guid>
		<description>Ah, Stephen, my own personal ray of sunshine, so nice to have you back :-)

As for posting this content in HTML: That would require reformatting the original documents in HTML, which is a lot of work -- especially for lengthy government docs.

The value of a service like scribd is the embedding, providing people a way to see the document in the browser without having to download a file and open it. Oh, and it provides and easy way for people to share the file too. 

All very valuable for folks who are not very web savvy; who mainly just know how to click links in their browser. Which is true for a large proportion of target audiences for hyperlocal sites.

Scribd does allow easy downloading too.

Scribd happens to have nicer-looking embedding -- but if the fullscreen function clashes with the site CMS, I&#039;ll have to switch to another service.

- Amy Gahran</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, Stephen, my own personal ray of sunshine, so nice to have you back <img src='http://www.contentious.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>As for posting this content in HTML: That would require reformatting the original documents in HTML, which is a lot of work &#8212; especially for lengthy government docs.</p>
<p>The value of a service like scribd is the embedding, providing people a way to see the document in the browser without having to download a file and open it. Oh, and it provides and easy way for people to share the file too. </p>
<p>All very valuable for folks who are not very web savvy; who mainly just know how to click links in their browser. Which is true for a large proportion of target audiences for hyperlocal sites.</p>
<p>Scribd does allow easy downloading too.</p>
<p>Scribd happens to have nicer-looking embedding &#8212; but if the fullscreen function clashes with the site CMS, I&#8217;ll have to switch to another service.</p>
<p>- Amy Gahran</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen Downes</title>
		<link>http://www.contentious.com/2010/01/04/wrestling-with-scribds-fullscreen-display/comment-page-1/#comment-1229845</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Downes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 00:28:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contentious.com/?p=3069#comment-1229845</guid>
		<description>What problem is Scribd solving? You were able to post content online perfectly easily using HTML or PDF. What value is Scribd adding, especially for the inconvenience it offers readers?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What problem is Scribd solving? You were able to post content online perfectly easily using HTML or PDF. What value is Scribd adding, especially for the inconvenience it offers readers?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

