<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: links for 2009-03-08</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.contentious.com/2009/03/08/links-for-2009-03-08/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.contentious.com/2009/03/08/links-for-2009-03-08/</link>
	<description>Amy Gahran's news and musings on how we communicate in the online age.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Jul 2010 22:39:23 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: mnmears</title>
		<link>http://www.contentious.com/2009/03/08/links-for-2009-03-08/comment-page-1/#comment-1226760</link>
		<dc:creator>mnmears</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 02:31:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contentious.com/2009/03/08/links-for-2009-03-08/#comment-1226760</guid>
		<description>Re: Print your own newpaper

Again, why are we reinventing the horse? 

If it&#039;s true that printing and delivery of a newspaper is the biggest (or second biggest) costs for publishers, why aren&#039;t they tapping into into home computers, which a majority of their subscribers likely own?

No, let&#039;s create a new machine, a Kindle-like text reader, something that people will likely have to buy or lease at some ridiculous cost. 

Why not simply utilize e-edition publication to its fullest, continue to improve on it, and market it for all its technological advantages TODAY?

This story almost made me want to check the calendar to see if that spring forward Daylight-Savings-time move propelled us to April 1.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re: Print your own newpaper</p>
<p>Again, why are we reinventing the horse? </p>
<p>If it&#8217;s true that printing and delivery of a newspaper is the biggest (or second biggest) costs for publishers, why aren&#8217;t they tapping into into home computers, which a majority of their subscribers likely own?</p>
<p>No, let&#8217;s create a new machine, a Kindle-like text reader, something that people will likely have to buy or lease at some ridiculous cost. </p>
<p>Why not simply utilize e-edition publication to its fullest, continue to improve on it, and market it for all its technological advantages TODAY?</p>
<p>This story almost made me want to check the calendar to see if that spring forward Daylight-Savings-time move propelled us to April 1.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
