<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Toxic Journo Culture Oozes Across Blogosphere</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.contentious.com/2008/04/29/toxic-journo-culture-oozes-across-blogosphere/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.contentious.com/2008/04/29/toxic-journo-culture-oozes-across-blogosphere/</link>
	<description>Amy Gahran's news and musings on how we communicate in the online age.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 16:36:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: MadamaAmbi</title>
		<link>http://www.contentious.com/2008/04/29/toxic-journo-culture-oozes-across-blogosphere/comment-page-1/#comment-1219690</link>
		<dc:creator>MadamaAmbi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 18:56:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contentious.com/?p=1616#comment-1219690</guid>
		<description>and then there are those nervy, non-journalists who put out their podcast shingles and the unsuspecting public picks and chooses based on likes, dislikes, affinities, social networking...and good journalistic standards can&#039;t compete with the force of group identification or charisma...but yeah, at least they ARE having fun...

I don&#039;t consider myself a journalist, but have found myself newly in a podcast about the Obama campaign (whom I support) and a few times have had to hold conversations up to a standard...but whose standard?...I never studied journalism...then again, I did do a master&#039;s degree in psychology and we did study ethics...or, maybe, if I dig even deeper, I&#039;ll find something inside of my own integral structure, my integrity, that helps me decide if I should air controversial material...

and I got caught, got used by a poseur who would say whatever he needed to say to get his voice on air...what is my responsibility here?...must I verify allegations?...opinions?...interpretations?...or am I just a conduit???

I&#039;m too new to podcasting to know where I stand on these questions, and I&#039;m not pulling enough listeners to feel that I have to make up my mind today before I corrupt innocent ears...but here I am, having spent a life in one way or another &quot;finding my voice&quot; via art forms, a very amateur, self-taught, no-frills, by-the-seat-of-my-pants podcaster...

and I like it...and I like the fact that my podcast is the opposite of slick...and when the Obama campaign is over and my original charter (or would that be my brand?...) drains of meaning, I have a feeling I will stretch, get a glass of water, and keep talking...and listening to my interviewees...

sometimes I feel I should apologize to all of you REAL journalists...and yet, there are so many unserved groups, and maybe my connections to some of these voices will matter...

yours, MadamaAmbi, Interview4Obama</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>and then there are those nervy, non-journalists who put out their podcast shingles and the unsuspecting public picks and chooses based on likes, dislikes, affinities, social networking&#8230;and good journalistic standards can&#8217;t compete with the force of group identification or charisma&#8230;but yeah, at least they ARE having fun&#8230;</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t consider myself a journalist, but have found myself newly in a podcast about the Obama campaign (whom I support) and a few times have had to hold conversations up to a standard&#8230;but whose standard?&#8230;I never studied journalism&#8230;then again, I did do a master&#8217;s degree in psychology and we did study ethics&#8230;or, maybe, if I dig even deeper, I&#8217;ll find something inside of my own integral structure, my integrity, that helps me decide if I should air controversial material&#8230;</p>
<p>and I got caught, got used by a poseur who would say whatever he needed to say to get his voice on air&#8230;what is my responsibility here?&#8230;must I verify allegations?&#8230;opinions?&#8230;interpretations?&#8230;or am I just a conduit???</p>
<p>I&#8217;m too new to podcasting to know where I stand on these questions, and I&#8217;m not pulling enough listeners to feel that I have to make up my mind today before I corrupt innocent ears&#8230;but here I am, having spent a life in one way or another &#8220;finding my voice&#8221; via art forms, a very amateur, self-taught, no-frills, by-the-seat-of-my-pants podcaster&#8230;</p>
<p>and I like it&#8230;and I like the fact that my podcast is the opposite of slick&#8230;and when the Obama campaign is over and my original charter (or would that be my brand?&#8230;) drains of meaning, I have a feeling I will stretch, get a glass of water, and keep talking&#8230;and listening to my interviewees&#8230;</p>
<p>sometimes I feel I should apologize to all of you REAL journalists&#8230;and yet, there are so many unserved groups, and maybe my connections to some of these voices will matter&#8230;</p>
<p>yours, MadamaAmbi, Interview4Obama</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

