<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Twitter Up, Blogging Down</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.contentious.com/2008/03/19/twitter-up-blogging-down/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.contentious.com/2008/03/19/twitter-up-blogging-down/</link>
	<description>Amy Gahran's news and musings on how we communicate in the online age.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 18:43:51 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Blogging more or less because of Twitter? &#124; Broadcasting Brain</title>
		<link>http://www.contentious.com/2008/03/19/twitter-up-blogging-down/#comment-1216498</link>
		<dc:creator>Blogging more or less because of Twitter? &#124; Broadcasting Brain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 13:37:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contentious.com/2008/03/19/twitter-up-blogging-down/#comment-1216498</guid>
		<description>[...] Gahran, who I&#8217;ve been following on Twitter, writes an interesting post about her experiences using Twitter vs. her standard blogs.  Quoting from her post: &#8230;I remember that blogs have always been an awkward tool to satisfy [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Gahran, who I&#8217;ve been following on Twitter, writes an interesting post about her experiences using Twitter vs. her standard blogs.  Quoting from her post: &#8230;I remember that blogs have always been an awkward tool to satisfy [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Dykeman</title>
		<link>http://www.contentious.com/2008/03/19/twitter-up-blogging-down/#comment-1216497</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Dykeman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 13:18:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contentious.com/2008/03/19/twitter-up-blogging-down/#comment-1216497</guid>
		<description>This deserves a post unto itself rather than a comment.  Thought-provoking article, I'll link back to it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This deserves a post unto itself rather than a comment.  Thought-provoking article, I&#8217;ll link back to it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Poulson</title>
		<link>http://www.contentious.com/2008/03/19/twitter-up-blogging-down/#comment-1216436</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Poulson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 18:04:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contentious.com/2008/03/19/twitter-up-blogging-down/#comment-1216436</guid>
		<description>I agree - from the writer's point of view. I enjoy sending out that crisp comment that my brain is bursting to release. After all, I've got important ideas circulating between my ears.
  But ask readers. I much rather read a thought that is fully fleshed out - one that has been considered, augmented, matured and perhaps altered as a result. Maybe that makes me a poor fit for conversational media.
  But Twitter strikes me as something other than conversation. It is a shout out, a eureka moment, a rough draft that may mature into a transaction that becomes conversational media.
  I'm new enough to twitter that I'm not yet ready to draw broad conclusions. But to me, twitter is a bit selfish and self-indulgent to be considered conversational media.
  Perhaps that's why I like it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree - from the writer&#8217;s point of view. I enjoy sending out that crisp comment that my brain is bursting to release. After all, I&#8217;ve got important ideas circulating between my ears.<br />
  But ask readers. I much rather read a thought that is fully fleshed out - one that has been considered, augmented, matured and perhaps altered as a result. Maybe that makes me a poor fit for conversational media.<br />
  But Twitter strikes me as something other than conversation. It is a shout out, a eureka moment, a rough draft that may mature into a transaction that becomes conversational media.<br />
  I&#8217;m new enough to twitter that I&#8217;m not yet ready to draw broad conclusions. But to me, twitter is a bit selfish and self-indulgent to be considered conversational media.<br />
  Perhaps that&#8217;s why I like it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
