<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: It&#8217;s Not About Your Site Anymore</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.contentious.com/2007/08/21/its-not-about-your-site-anymore/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.contentious.com/2007/08/21/its-not-about-your-site-anymore/</link>
	<description>Amy Gahran's news and musings on how we communicate in the online age.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 20:38:23 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Amy Gahran</title>
		<link>http://www.contentious.com/2007/08/21/its-not-about-your-site-anymore/comment-page-1/#comment-1205247</link>
		<dc:creator>Amy Gahran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2007 18:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contentious.com/archives/2007/08/21/its-not-about-your-site-anymore/#comment-1205247</guid>
		<description>Steve -- thanks so much for your comments. Sorry for my delayed response, but I had a lot to say. So I posted my response to you here:

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.contentious.com/archives/2007/08/29/feeds-getting-pretty-mainstream/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Feeds: Getting Pretty Mainstream&lt;/a&gt;

Would love to hear your thoughts.

- Amy Gahran</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve &#8212; thanks so much for your comments. Sorry for my delayed response, but I had a lot to say. So I posted my response to you here:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.contentious.com/archives/2007/08/29/feeds-getting-pretty-mainstream/" rel="nofollow">Feeds: Getting Pretty Mainstream</a></p>
<p>Would love to hear your thoughts.</p>
<p>- Amy Gahran</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: contentious.com - Feeds: Getting Pretty Mainstream</title>
		<link>http://www.contentious.com/2007/08/21/its-not-about-your-site-anymore/comment-page-1/#comment-1205245</link>
		<dc:creator>contentious.com - Feeds: Getting Pretty Mainstream</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2007 18:17:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contentious.com/archives/2007/08/21/its-not-about-your-site-anymore/#comment-1205245</guid>
		<description>[...] my Aug. 21 post, It&#8217;s not about your site anymore, I talked about how web sites are becoming less important for online content distribution as RSS [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] my Aug. 21 post, It&#8217;s not about your site anymore, I talked about how web sites are becoming less important for online content distribution as RSS [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amy Gahran</title>
		<link>http://www.contentious.com/2007/08/21/its-not-about-your-site-anymore/comment-page-1/#comment-1205239</link>
		<dc:creator>Amy Gahran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2007 15:25:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contentious.com/archives/2007/08/21/its-not-about-your-site-anymore/#comment-1205239</guid>
		<description>Gordon wrote: &quot;If you are just undertaking this dare, DO stick with it for at least two weeks. It took me almost two years of continual trying to ‘get’ the whole syndication thing, now that I have, I’m happily creating my own little sofa dent. (OK, maybe not so little).&quot;

Yes, that&#039;s a great point, Gordon. Trying out anything new takes time and always feels strange or even uncomfortable at first.

- Amy Gahran</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gordon wrote: &#8220;If you are just undertaking this dare, DO stick with it for at least two weeks. It took me almost two years of continual trying to ‘get’ the whole syndication thing, now that I have, I’m happily creating my own little sofa dent. (OK, maybe not so little).&#8221;</p>
<p>Yes, that&#8217;s a great point, Gordon. Trying out anything new takes time and always feels strange or even uncomfortable at first.</p>
<p>- Amy Gahran</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Sergeant</title>
		<link>http://www.contentious.com/2007/08/21/its-not-about-your-site-anymore/comment-page-1/#comment-1204957</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Sergeant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Aug 2007 19:15:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contentious.com/archives/2007/08/21/its-not-about-your-site-anymore/#comment-1204957</guid>
		<description>Answering my own post, it appears that Jeff Jarvis has found some numbers, by way of IBM and Om Malik: http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/08/22/tv-explodes-the-chain-reaction-hits-critical-mass/

&quot;* 74% contributed to a social network; 93% contributed to a user content site. Who says that forums are only for nuts, blogs for early adopters, and photo services for geeks? Everybody’s making content. Why do they do it? Feel part of a community, 31%; recognition from peers, 28%. Conversation.&quot;

I suspect that this data may be skewed by the fact that it was based on a 40-question Internet survey.  If it was based on a land-line phone survey of home owners, we&#039;d probably get very different results.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Answering my own post, it appears that Jeff Jarvis has found some numbers, by way of IBM and Om Malik: <a href="http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/08/22/tv-explodes-the-chain-reaction-hits-critical-mass/" rel="nofollow">http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/08/22/tv-explodes-the-chain-reaction-hits-critical-mass/</a></p>
<p>&#8220;* 74% contributed to a social network; 93% contributed to a user content site. Who says that forums are only for nuts, blogs for early adopters, and photo services for geeks? Everybody’s making content. Why do they do it? Feel part of a community, 31%; recognition from peers, 28%. Conversation.&#8221;</p>
<p>I suspect that this data may be skewed by the fact that it was based on a 40-question Internet survey.  If it was based on a land-line phone survey of home owners, we&#8217;d probably get very different results.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Sergeant</title>
		<link>http://www.contentious.com/2007/08/21/its-not-about-your-site-anymore/comment-page-1/#comment-1204938</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Sergeant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 22:06:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contentious.com/archives/2007/08/21/its-not-about-your-site-anymore/#comment-1204938</guid>
		<description>I agree that this is true for the bleeding-edge, early adopters, among which I count myself. I&#039;m in the choir for your sermon.

But in my experience, the average news consumer and person with a non-media job often has no idea what an RSS reader or aggregator is.  Sure, an adventuresome few have discovered iTunes for podcasts or some server-side aggregator, like My Yahoo.

It would be interesting to see surveys on what percentage of the general population have ever commented on a blog.  Look at how few typically wrote to newspaper editors or called-in to radio stations -- they&#039;re a small percentage of the audience.

Using your analogy, I see plenty of people who are perfectly happy to plunk themselves down in a furnished apartment and feel very little need to customize it.  I suspect that most people don&#039;t want to hunt, they just want to be fed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that this is true for the bleeding-edge, early adopters, among which I count myself. I&#8217;m in the choir for your sermon.</p>
<p>But in my experience, the average news consumer and person with a non-media job often has no idea what an RSS reader or aggregator is.  Sure, an adventuresome few have discovered iTunes for podcasts or some server-side aggregator, like My Yahoo.</p>
<p>It would be interesting to see surveys on what percentage of the general population have ever commented on a blog.  Look at how few typically wrote to newspaper editors or called-in to radio stations &#8212; they&#8217;re a small percentage of the audience.</p>
<p>Using your analogy, I see plenty of people who are perfectly happy to plunk themselves down in a furnished apartment and feel very little need to customize it.  I suspect that most people don&#8217;t want to hunt, they just want to be fed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gordon</title>
		<link>http://www.contentious.com/2007/08/21/its-not-about-your-site-anymore/comment-page-1/#comment-1204935</link>
		<dc:creator>Gordon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 19:45:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contentious.com/archives/2007/08/21/its-not-about-your-site-anymore/#comment-1204935</guid>
		<description>I took this dare about 6 months ago and have to agree.

I&#039;m now at the point where, if you don&#039;t offer an RSS feed of any sort, I ain&#039;t reading you. Simple.

I also note that I am still happy to visit a site if I want to, like this, add a comment, but I also monitor several sites which don&#039;t update very often... using their RSS feed means I don&#039;t CARE that they don&#039;t update very often because it doesn&#039;t cost me anything. If they do post, Google Reader lets me know all about it.

So, full feeds matter.

Ohh and if you are just undertaking this dare, DO stick with it for at least two weeks. It took me almost two years of continual trying to &#039;get&#039; the whole syndication thing, now that I have, I&#039;m happily creating my own little sofa dent. (OK, maybe not so little).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I took this dare about 6 months ago and have to agree.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m now at the point where, if you don&#8217;t offer an RSS feed of any sort, I ain&#8217;t reading you. Simple.</p>
<p>I also note that I am still happy to visit a site if I want to, like this, add a comment, but I also monitor several sites which don&#8217;t update very often&#8230; using their RSS feed means I don&#8217;t CARE that they don&#8217;t update very often because it doesn&#8217;t cost me anything. If they do post, Google Reader lets me know all about it.</p>
<p>So, full feeds matter.</p>
<p>Ohh and if you are just undertaking this dare, DO stick with it for at least two weeks. It took me almost two years of continual trying to &#8216;get&#8217; the whole syndication thing, now that I have, I&#8217;m happily creating my own little sofa dent. (OK, maybe not so little).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
