<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What Does Feedburner&#8217;s &#8220;Reach&#8221; Really Mean?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.contentious.com/2007/08/16/what-feedburners-reach-really-means/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.contentious.com/2007/08/16/what-feedburners-reach-really-means/</link>
	<description>Amy Gahran's news and musings on how we communicate in the online age.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 14:54:13 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ian Delaney</title>
		<link>http://www.contentious.com/2007/08/16/what-feedburners-reach-really-means/#comment-1204842</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian Delaney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2007 10:26:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contentious.com/archives/2007/08/16/what-feedburners-reach-really-means/#comment-1204842</guid>
		<description>So you could artificially increase your reach by offering partial feeds? Sounds like the old publisher's trick of increasing page views by splitting an article over several pages.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So you could artificially increase your reach by offering partial feeds? Sounds like the old publisher&#8217;s trick of increasing page views by splitting an article over several pages.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
