<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cory Doctorow on Traditional Publishing vs. Conversational Media</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.contentious.com/2006/02/14/cory-doctorow-on-traditional-publishing-vs-conversational-media/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.contentious.com/2006/02/14/cory-doctorow-on-traditional-publishing-vs-conversational-media/</link>
	<description>Amy Gahran's news and musings on how we communicate in the online age.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 16:36:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Antony Van Couvering</title>
		<link>http://www.contentious.com/2006/02/14/cory-doctorow-on-traditional-publishing-vs-conversational-media/comment-page-1/#comment-59650</link>
		<dc:creator>Antony Van Couvering</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2006 18:13:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-59650</guid>
		<description>While it&#039;s short-sighted for publishers not to publish their stuff online, I&#039;m completely at a loss why they would want Google to do it on GoogleBooks.  Why not just publish it themselves?  That way they get the book indexed in Google&#039;s primary index (and those of other search engines) instead of the secondary book index.  Furthermore, there&#039;s nothing to prevent them from doing both.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While it&#8217;s short-sighted for publishers not to publish their stuff online, I&#8217;m completely at a loss why they would want Google to do it on GoogleBooks.  Why not just publish it themselves?  That way they get the book indexed in Google&#8217;s primary index (and those of other search engines) instead of the secondary book index.  Furthermore, there&#8217;s nothing to prevent them from doing both.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Romerican</title>
		<link>http://www.contentious.com/2006/02/14/cory-doctorow-on-traditional-publishing-vs-conversational-media/comment-page-1/#comment-59036</link>
		<dc:creator>Romerican</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2006 15:46:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-59036</guid>
		<description>Your post reminds me of another I read today over at PaidContent* where there&#039;s a quote from a former AT&amp;T exec who likens Google to Comcast, in that they view Google as a potential adversary.  Once again, like in your post, we have another example of powerbrokers who don&#039;t quite &quot;get it&quot; about how the content world is probably restructing itself (unless, of course, they keep bribing politicians to enact draconian measures as we&#039;ve witnessed).

(* - http://www.paidcontent.org/pc/arch/2006_02_13.shtml#053626 )</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your post reminds me of another I read today over at PaidContent* where there&#8217;s a quote from a former AT&#038;T exec who likens Google to Comcast, in that they view Google as a potential adversary.  Once again, like in your post, we have another example of powerbrokers who don&#8217;t quite &#8220;get it&#8221; about how the content world is probably restructing itself (unless, of course, they keep bribing politicians to enact draconian measures as we&#8217;ve witnessed).</p>
<p>(* &#8211; <a href="http://www.paidcontent.org/pc/arch/2006_02_13.shtml#053626" rel="nofollow">http://www.paidcontent.org/pc/arch/2006_02_13.shtml#053626</a> )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

