<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: When is Google Going to Confront Blog Spam?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.contentious.com/2005/10/21/when-is-google-going-to-confront-blog-spam/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.contentious.com/2005/10/21/when-is-google-going-to-confront-blog-spam/</link>
	<description>Amy Gahran's news and musings on how we communicate in the online age.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 23:05:51 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Alan</title>
		<link>http://www.contentious.com/2005/10/21/when-is-google-going-to-confront-blog-spam/#comment-38985</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2005 13:36:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-38985</guid>
		<description>They can/should do something even better. Any company that has the intelligence to create PageRank ought to be able to develop algorithms for determining fake spamblog content from real stuff.

Ot they can tie into the new SplogSpot service (http://splogspot.com/) that is catalogging splogs and offer an API that can be easily be integrated into other software.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They can/should do something even better. Any company that has the intelligence to create PageRank ought to be able to develop algorithms for determining fake spamblog content from real stuff.</p>
<p>Ot they can tie into the new SplogSpot service (http://splogspot.com/) that is catalogging splogs and offer an API that can be easily be integrated into other software.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
