headermask image

header image

Microsoft Likes \”Webfeeds\”

One story making the rounds in today’s tech news headlines is that Microsoft apparently has decided that the word “RSS” is not palatable to a consumer audience. In the current beta of the upcoming release of its popular browser, Internet Explorer (which includes feed functionality), Microsoft is referring to “webfeeds,” not “RSS.” (More on the Microsoft decision.)

Hmmmm…. “webfeeds.” Sound familiar?

Longtime Contentious readers may recall that last year I held a contest to find a less geeky, more descriptive and user-friendly nickname for the communication channel made possible by the RSS and Atom standards. The winning nickname (announced April 30, 2004) was – you guessed it – webfeeds.

Since then, I’ve noticed that the term webfeed has been steadily gaining traction. I guess someone at Microsoft noticed, too…

(Background: What’s a webfeed?)

True, webfeed is not yet nearly as popular as “RSS” – but then again, feed usage remains nowhere near as commonplace as it could/should be among internet users in general.

I’m not saying the name is the only barrier to widespread adoption. Thanks to various new tools and services, feeds are now much easier to use than they were in early 2004. But still, they’re just a little too geeky for the average nontechnical web user – in my humble opinion, of course.

In this TechWeb article yesterday, Antone Gonsalves said the shift to “webfeed” is “a sign that the acronym used to described technology for distributing content on the web is on its way out in the consumer market.”

Honestly, I don’t know whether he’s right. Microsoft has a checkered history regarding names and re-branding. As Gavin Clarke noted in The Register yesterday: “Famously, Microsoft re-named and ‘optimized’ its implementation of Sun Microsystems’ Java language, in a move that saw Sun prosecute Microsoft for breaking compatibility with Sun’s official Java specification.”

So we’ll see what happens. I find this all amusing, and frankly rather gratifying after the personal
derision, ridicule, and outright vitriol
I received from the creators and early adopters of feeds simply for holding my little contest.

…And for those of you who dislike/distrust Microsoft, no, I didn’t “join the dark side.” If anything, the “dark side” joined me.

It’ll be interesting to watch this one.

If you liked my post, feel free to subscribe to my rss feeds

4 Comments so far (Add 1 more)

  1. Amy

    You’ll be pleased to know that at the Blog Business Summit when MS made this statement about webfeeds, someone in the audience made a very vocal point of attributing this name to the Contentious contest.

    1. Sally Falkow on August 30th, 2005 at 8:55 am
  2. >ABC, CBS, NBC, BBC, HBO, VHS, or DVD

    And we *still* do not know what DVD stands for ….

    2. Tom on August 22nd, 2005 at 11:57 pm
  3. I really am of the belief that RSS is too hard to explain to the non-geek. Eyes glaze over. I’ve seen it time and again when extolling the virtues of RSS.

    I personally just like Feeds, as people can rationalise the idea in seconds - without much explanation.

    3. Des Paroz on August 19th, 2005 at 4:24 pm
  4. To me, this is an absolutely ridiculous debate. If I say ABC, CBS, NBC, BBC, HBO, VHS, or DVD you are likely to know exactly what I mean. I’m far more interested in finding ways to communicate the value and potential of an important and established technology standard - RSS - than I am in trying to re-brand it many years too late.

    4. Richie Carey on August 19th, 2005 at 3:31 pm