<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why I Outed Myself at Blogher</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.contentious.com/2005/08/01/why-i-outed-myself-at-blogher/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.contentious.com/2005/08/01/why-i-outed-myself-at-blogher/</link>
	<description>Amy Gahran's news and musings on how we communicate in the online age.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 20:38:23 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: pingVision</title>
		<link>http://www.contentious.com/2005/08/01/why-i-outed-myself-at-blogher/comment-page-1/#comment-29625</link>
		<dc:creator>pingVision</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2005 07:56:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-29625</guid>
		<description>&lt;trackback /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;On getting personal in business blogging&lt;/strong&gt;
 
When I first started writing this blog on pingVision, I wondered about how personal I could or should get on what ostensibly is a &quot;professional&quot; blog. Well, the topic came up recently on a number of business blogs, so what better time to revisit th...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<trackback /><strong>On getting personal in business blogging</strong></p>
<p>When I first started writing this blog on pingVision, I wondered about how personal I could or should get on what ostensibly is a &#8220;professional&#8221; blog. Well, the topic came up recently on a number of business blogs, so what better time to revisit th&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Melissa Gira</title>
		<link>http://www.contentious.com/2005/08/01/why-i-outed-myself-at-blogher/comment-page-1/#comment-28960</link>
		<dc:creator>Melissa Gira</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2005 05:28:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-28960</guid>
		<description>Amy, so glad you are continuing this conversation here -- and that I just found the entry.  (Liveblogging that moment was interesting -- I figured, if you&#039;re out, you&#039;re out, and so wrote freely.)

One thing taken for granted in this debate, personal vs. professional, is that for increasingly more people, their heretofore-thought-of-as-&quot;personal&quot; lives are woven right through their professional careers.  For some people, work is just work, and they don&#039;t want to bring any of their &quot;real&quot; selves to the table.  For me, laboring under that kind of pressure is soulless and dehumanizing, which has required me to both out myself accordingly and to accept where the chips fall, if they may.

Yes, I&#039;m queer, and poly, and a whore, and yes, I&#039;d much rather, as Catherine La Croix says, &quot;I&#039;d rather be detested for the truth than loathed for the lie.&quot;

Although, an aside: I also get to enjoy the weird nakedness of the sex industry, where one finds oneself masturbating in front of strangers with one&#039;s colleagues before one even knows the names of the partners of kids.  (Talk about challenging one&#039;s ideas of personal and professional...)

I wonder, after you outed yourself, did you find yourself embroiled in any &quot;interesting&quot; side conversations at Blogher?  I suppose I came pre-outed by virtue of my blog URL, and was totally (happily) surprised at the number of sexual confidences and secrets I became party when Blogher attendees took me aside.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amy, so glad you are continuing this conversation here &#8212; and that I just found the entry.  (Liveblogging that moment was interesting &#8212; I figured, if you&#8217;re out, you&#8217;re out, and so wrote freely.)</p>
<p>One thing taken for granted in this debate, personal vs. professional, is that for increasingly more people, their heretofore-thought-of-as-&#8221;personal&#8221; lives are woven right through their professional careers.  For some people, work is just work, and they don&#8217;t want to bring any of their &#8220;real&#8221; selves to the table.  For me, laboring under that kind of pressure is soulless and dehumanizing, which has required me to both out myself accordingly and to accept where the chips fall, if they may.</p>
<p>Yes, I&#8217;m queer, and poly, and a whore, and yes, I&#8217;d much rather, as Catherine La Croix says, &#8220;I&#8217;d rather be detested for the truth than loathed for the lie.&#8221;</p>
<p>Although, an aside: I also get to enjoy the weird nakedness of the sex industry, where one finds oneself masturbating in front of strangers with one&#8217;s colleagues before one even knows the names of the partners of kids.  (Talk about challenging one&#8217;s ideas of personal and professional&#8230;)</p>
<p>I wonder, after you outed yourself, did you find yourself embroiled in any &#8220;interesting&#8221; side conversations at Blogher?  I suppose I came pre-outed by virtue of my blog URL, and was totally (happily) surprised at the number of sexual confidences and secrets I became party when Blogher attendees took me aside.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Allen</title>
		<link>http://www.contentious.com/2005/08/01/why-i-outed-myself-at-blogher/comment-page-1/#comment-28953</link>
		<dc:creator>Allen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Aug 2005 22:41:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-28953</guid>
		<description>Amy,

I must admit that I had never heard the term, polyamorous, before reading your post and had to follow your link to wikipedia. I suspected that it was similar to polygamy however; suspecting and knowing are two different things.

Am I a back-woods, uneducated Texas hick? No. I lived the better part of the 1990&#039;s in Atlanta, GA and my job required me to spend a good bit of time in Boston, MA and Buffalo, NY. I admit that I was exposed to allot of things that you will not openly find here in Texas but polyamory was not one of them.

My personal convictions on polygamy / polyamory are not as strong as they are on homosexuality. The only problem that I have is that I don&#039;t understand how a person can be emotionally and intimately attached to two different people at the same time. How do you deal with the jealousy, conflicts and possessiveness that are bound to show up? (no response needed)

Also, I do not believe that polyamory or polygamy is as hotly contested social issues as homosexuality is. Considering what sparked your survey, I can&#039;t help but wonder if asking questions about homosexuality is fair to you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amy,</p>
<p>I must admit that I had never heard the term, polyamorous, before reading your post and had to follow your link to wikipedia. I suspected that it was similar to polygamy however; suspecting and knowing are two different things.</p>
<p>Am I a back-woods, uneducated Texas hick? No. I lived the better part of the 1990&#8217;s in Atlanta, GA and my job required me to spend a good bit of time in Boston, MA and Buffalo, NY. I admit that I was exposed to allot of things that you will not openly find here in Texas but polyamory was not one of them.</p>
<p>My personal convictions on polygamy / polyamory are not as strong as they are on homosexuality. The only problem that I have is that I don&#8217;t understand how a person can be emotionally and intimately attached to two different people at the same time. How do you deal with the jealousy, conflicts and possessiveness that are bound to show up? (no response needed)</p>
<p>Also, I do not believe that polyamory or polygamy is as hotly contested social issues as homosexuality is. Considering what sparked your survey, I can&#8217;t help but wonder if asking questions about homosexuality is fair to you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven Streight</title>
		<link>http://www.contentious.com/2005/08/01/why-i-outed-myself-at-blogher/comment-page-1/#comment-28860</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven Streight</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Aug 2005 07:19:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-28860</guid>
		<description>If this private aspect is important to you Amy, perhaps a separate blog on the topic, linked to from this blog, would be good to start.

I don&#039;t understand poly, but I respect whatever you choose to do in your life.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If this private aspect is important to you Amy, perhaps a separate blog on the topic, linked to from this blog, would be good to start.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t understand poly, but I respect whatever you choose to do in your life.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darren</title>
		<link>http://www.contentious.com/2005/08/01/why-i-outed-myself-at-blogher/comment-page-1/#comment-28736</link>
		<dc:creator>Darren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2005 05:16:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-28736</guid>
		<description>Whoops. The sentence &quot;I don’t press my on her&quot; should actually read &quot;I don&#039;t press my [heterosexulity, monogamy, love of fly fishing] on her.&quot; Darned angle brackets.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whoops. The sentence &#8220;I don’t press my on her&#8221; should actually read &#8220;I don&#8217;t press my [heterosexulity, monogamy, love of fly fishing] on her.&#8221; Darned angle brackets.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darren</title>
		<link>http://www.contentious.com/2005/08/01/why-i-outed-myself-at-blogher/comment-page-1/#comment-28732</link>
		<dc:creator>Darren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2005 03:33:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-28732</guid>
		<description>I am profoundly uninterested in the sexual preferences or proclivities of any of my colleagues (a group, I should point out, which does not include Amy). I don&#039;t think they have any impact on my professional relationship with them. 

I also, for example, don&#039;t care if any of my colleagues are philatelists. They may perceive their interest in philately as central to their being. I do not, so it&#039;s nearly useless information to me.

As such, I can think of no compelling reasons to prominently reveal such personal information. I&#039;m not opposed to the revelation--unquestionably the barriers between the personal and the professional &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.paulgraham.com/opensource.html&quot;&gt;are breaking down&lt;/a&gt;. However, it&#039;s a matter of little or no import.

As such, if, in the course of her professaionl blogging, Amy happened to mention her polyamorous status (say, she was at a conference with a partner, or worked on a polyamory advocacy site), that&#039;s fine. That&#039;s in the context of revelant professional activity. The most important thing, as Amy says, is not to make &quot;a huge deal out of it&quot;. 

A huge, flashing sign (or entry) on a professional site that reads &quot;I&#039;m Polyamorous and Proud of It&quot; would perturb me not because of Amy&#039;s choice, but because of the egotism it implies. If I&#039;m her colleague or client, I&#039;m thinking: &quot;why does she think I should care about this aspect of her personal life, when we have a professional relationship? I don&#039;t press my &lt;heterosexuality , homosexuality, love of fly fishing, etc&gt; on her.&quot;

Amy&#039;s philosophy regarding potential business won and lost is dead-on. Though I chose not to reveal as much personal information, potential clients could be repelled by statements on my site. For example, I did a chunk of volunteer work supporting gay marriage in the US. It&#039;s possible a homophobic potential client might look elsewhere because of that. I&#039;ve always said what Amy said--if that&#039;s their view, then I probably don&#039;t want to work with them.&lt;/heterosexuality&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am profoundly uninterested in the sexual preferences or proclivities of any of my colleagues (a group, I should point out, which does not include Amy). I don&#8217;t think they have any impact on my professional relationship with them. </p>
<p>I also, for example, don&#8217;t care if any of my colleagues are philatelists. They may perceive their interest in philately as central to their being. I do not, so it&#8217;s nearly useless information to me.</p>
<p>As such, I can think of no compelling reasons to prominently reveal such personal information. I&#8217;m not opposed to the revelation&#8211;unquestionably the barriers between the personal and the professional <a href="http://www.paulgraham.com/opensource.html">are breaking down</a>. However, it&#8217;s a matter of little or no import.</p>
<p>As such, if, in the course of her professaionl blogging, Amy happened to mention her polyamorous status (say, she was at a conference with a partner, or worked on a polyamory advocacy site), that&#8217;s fine. That&#8217;s in the context of revelant professional activity. The most important thing, as Amy says, is not to make &#8220;a huge deal out of it&#8221;. </p>
<p>A huge, flashing sign (or entry) on a professional site that reads &#8220;I&#8217;m Polyamorous and Proud of It&#8221; would perturb me not because of Amy&#8217;s choice, but because of the egotism it implies. If I&#8217;m her colleague or client, I&#8217;m thinking: &#8220;why does she think I should care about this aspect of her personal life, when we have a professional relationship? I don&#8217;t press my <heterosexuality , homosexuality, love of fly fishing, etc> on her.&#8221;</p>
<p>Amy&#8217;s philosophy regarding potential business won and lost is dead-on. Though I chose not to reveal as much personal information, potential clients could be repelled by statements on my site. For example, I did a chunk of volunteer work supporting gay marriage in the US. It&#8217;s possible a homophobic potential client might look elsewhere because of that. I&#8217;ve always said what Amy said&#8211;if that&#8217;s their view, then I probably don&#8217;t want to work with them.</heterosexuality></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: susan mernit</title>
		<link>http://www.contentious.com/2005/08/01/why-i-outed-myself-at-blogher/comment-page-1/#comment-28587</link>
		<dc:creator>susan mernit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Aug 2005 16:04:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-28587</guid>
		<description>Amy--I applaud your right to take control of how you are perceived and share everything/anything you want to. Is it professional? Who cares? You get to set the frame work.
For me, the most interesting discussions at BlogHer were about that place where professional and personal overlap and we can each see the choices we are making--your sharing in that context was FANTASTIC.  I would like to talk more--best, Susan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amy&#8211;I applaud your right to take control of how you are perceived and share everything/anything you want to. Is it professional? Who cares? You get to set the frame work.<br />
For me, the most interesting discussions at BlogHer were about that place where professional and personal overlap and we can each see the choices we are making&#8211;your sharing in that context was FANTASTIC.  I would like to talk more&#8211;best, Susan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blog Consulting &#38; Professional Blogging a View from the Isle</title>
		<link>http://www.contentious.com/2005/08/01/why-i-outed-myself-at-blogher/comment-page-1/#comment-28574</link>
		<dc:creator>Blog Consulting &#38; Professional Blogging a View from the Isle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Aug 2005 23:35:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-28574</guid>
		<description>&lt;trackback /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Let&#039;s help a courageous woman ...&lt;/strong&gt;
It&#039;s odd the connections we make on the Blogosphere.&#160; Cary of&#160;Cancer NewsWatch&#160;pinged me while I was guest blogging for Darren.&#160;&#160;His wife Lori has ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<trackback /><strong>Let&#8217;s help a courageous woman &#8230;</strong><br />
It&#8217;s odd the connections we make on the Blogosphere.&nbsp; Cary of&nbsp;Cancer NewsWatch&nbsp;pinged me while I was guest blogging for Darren.&nbsp;&nbsp;His wife Lori has &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nancy White</title>
		<link>http://www.contentious.com/2005/08/01/why-i-outed-myself-at-blogher/comment-page-1/#comment-28464</link>
		<dc:creator>Nancy White</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2005 16:56:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-28464</guid>
		<description>One of the key things for me at Blogher was to forward my thinking about identity: how we express it, particularly online, particularly in blogs. Everything in the &quot;How to Get Naked&quot; session, including your offering, Amy, was part of that exploration. I think this is critical to explore. It is a whole new way of &quot;being ourselves&quot; (or not) that is worth some conversation and thinking. Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the key things for me at Blogher was to forward my thinking about identity: how we express it, particularly online, particularly in blogs. Everything in the &#8220;How to Get Naked&#8221; session, including your offering, Amy, was part of that exploration. I think this is critical to explore. It is a whole new way of &#8220;being ourselves&#8221; (or not) that is worth some conversation and thinking. Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wes Thorp</title>
		<link>http://www.contentious.com/2005/08/01/why-i-outed-myself-at-blogher/comment-page-1/#comment-28462</link>
		<dc:creator>Wes Thorp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2005 13:28:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-28462</guid>
		<description>Amy-I respect you professionally.  I&#039;ve been to Contentious more than a hundred times, I bet and I&#039;ve followed your citizen journalism work closely.  Your personal life is yours.  You have a lot more to contribute in the online areas you are involved with.  I&#039;m very appreciative of what you have already done.  I hope it doesn&#039;t get tied up with what you do in your personal life.  By the way, I&#039;m a right-wing Republican evangelical Christian who has gone to Promise Keepers events for the past 11 years.  There, I&#039;m out.  WES</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amy-I respect you professionally.  I&#8217;ve been to Contentious more than a hundred times, I bet and I&#8217;ve followed your citizen journalism work closely.  Your personal life is yours.  You have a lot more to contribute in the online areas you are involved with.  I&#8217;m very appreciative of what you have already done.  I hope it doesn&#8217;t get tied up with what you do in your personal life.  By the way, I&#8217;m a right-wing Republican evangelical Christian who has gone to Promise Keepers events for the past 11 years.  There, I&#8217;m out.  WES</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
