<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Where Does the Public Conversation Start?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.contentious.com/2005/07/31/where-does-the-public-conversation-start/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.contentious.com/2005/07/31/where-does-the-public-conversation-start/</link>
	<description>Amy Gahran's news and musings on how we communicate in the online age.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 16:36:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: badgerbag</title>
		<link>http://www.contentious.com/2005/07/31/where-does-the-public-conversation-start/comment-page-1/#comment-28398</link>
		<dc:creator>badgerbag</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2005 06:11:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-28398</guid>
		<description>I was thinking more about the &quot;terror&quot; comments by Jay (I was hatin&#039; on him when he stood up to talk - it was such a pat on the head! oh, how brave, in our climate of terror, to face your terror of the internet! - but his post is better by miles and not at all what I thought it would be).  How weirded out he seemed to be, that people might talk about doubt, fear, insecurity and still ACT.  As if everyone didn&#039;t feel that stuff?  Showing vulnerability is not weakness - it&#039;s being so strong you can risk it. 

Clearly, too, if you have less privilege to lose you&#039;re not so afraid to throw it on the table.  Among the subaltern, deliberate vulnerability inspires trust - boasting doesn&#039;t.  I don&#039;t think any essentialist &quot;women are this way&quot; explanation is necessary.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was thinking more about the &#8220;terror&#8221; comments by Jay (I was hatin&#8217; on him when he stood up to talk &#8211; it was such a pat on the head! oh, how brave, in our climate of terror, to face your terror of the internet! &#8211; but his post is better by miles and not at all what I thought it would be).  How weirded out he seemed to be, that people might talk about doubt, fear, insecurity and still ACT.  As if everyone didn&#8217;t feel that stuff?  Showing vulnerability is not weakness &#8211; it&#8217;s being so strong you can risk it. </p>
<p>Clearly, too, if you have less privilege to lose you&#8217;re not so afraid to throw it on the table.  Among the subaltern, deliberate vulnerability inspires trust &#8211; boasting doesn&#8217;t.  I don&#8217;t think any essentialist &#8220;women are this way&#8221; explanation is necessary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roger Benningfield</title>
		<link>http://www.contentious.com/2005/07/31/where-does-the-public-conversation-start/comment-page-1/#comment-28303</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger Benningfield</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2005 04:20:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-28303</guid>
		<description>Amy: &quot;And I like the idea of taking away anyone’s ability to threaten me with being “outed&quot;

Good for you, although I think your post on CNet already did the job. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amy: &#8220;And I like the idea of taking away anyone’s ability to threaten me with being “outed&#8221;</p>
<p>Good for you, although I think your post on CNet already did the job. <img src='http://www.contentious.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

