<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: NYT Thinks \&#8221;RSS\&#8221; is an Awkward Acronym</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.contentious.com/2005/06/30/nyt-thinks-rss-is-an-awkward-acronym/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.contentious.com/2005/06/30/nyt-thinks-rss-is-an-awkward-acronym/</link>
	<description>Amy Gahran's news and musings on how we communicate in the online age.</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 13:27:36 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Georg Berg\'s Notizen</title>
		<link>http://www.contentious.com/2005/06/30/nyt-thinks-rss-is-an-awkward-acronym/#comment-25832</link>
		<dc:creator>Georg Berg\'s Notizen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jul 2005 20:34:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-25832</guid>
		<description>&lt;trackback /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;NYT Thinks &lt;/strong&gt;
In his June 23 New York Times piece, "What's in a Product Name?" columnist David Pogue observed: "Some good technologies don't even stand for something that people can agree on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<trackback /><strong>NYT Thinks </strong><br />
In his June 23 New York Times piece, &#8220;What&#8217;s in a Product Name?&#8221; columnist David Pogue observed: &#8220;Some good technologies don&#8217;t even stand for something that people can agree on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lumpy</title>
		<link>http://www.contentious.com/2005/06/30/nyt-thinks-rss-is-an-awkward-acronym/#comment-23611</link>
		<dc:creator>Lumpy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jul 2005 15:51:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-23611</guid>
		<description>I agree that RSS is not the best label but I also think that people who use the technology know what it is.

I also agree that the calling it a web feed is a good idea.

As far as your button goes, you can use &lt;a href="http://kalsey.com/tools/buttonmaker/"&gt;Adam Kasely's button maker&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that RSS is not the best label but I also think that people who use the technology know what it is.</p>
<p>I also agree that the calling it a web feed is a good idea.</p>
<p>As far as your button goes, you can use <a href="http://kalsey.com/tools/buttonmaker/">Adam Kasely&#8217;s button maker</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Thilk</title>
		<link>http://www.contentious.com/2005/06/30/nyt-thinks-rss-is-an-awkward-acronym/#comment-23603</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Thilk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2005 17:58:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-23603</guid>
		<description>No, RSS isn't the best term but it's far from confusing as a name I think. 
Bacon's actually just released a white paper in an effort to help people who might
be intimidated understand the technology. http://www.bacons.com/landing/RSS_Bacons_Homepage.asp</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, RSS isn&#8217;t the best term but it&#8217;s far from confusing as a name I think.<br />
Bacon&#8217;s actually just released a white paper in an effort to help people who might<br />
be intimidated understand the technology. <a href="http://www.bacons.com/landing/RSS_Bacons_Homepage.asp" rel="nofollow">http://www.bacons.com/landing/RSS_Bacons_Homepage.asp</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anup</title>
		<link>http://www.contentious.com/2005/06/30/nyt-thinks-rss-is-an-awkward-acronym/#comment-23602</link>
		<dc:creator>Anup</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2005 10:16:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-23602</guid>
		<description>I would tend to agree (even though I also use RSS -- and worse, show an XML button as so many do that! I will change this when I get some time though!)

RSS is not the only format to receive a webfeed (e.g. ATOM). Hence, webfeed is more activity or user focused, where as RSS is just one technology to provide the web feed. Hence, I think web feed is therefore a better term that should be used. Perhaps you can create a little orange webfeed button :) Maybe that will help it take off!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would tend to agree (even though I also use RSS &#8212; and worse, show an XML button as so many do that! I will change this when I get some time though!)</p>
<p>RSS is not the only format to receive a webfeed (e.g. ATOM). Hence, webfeed is more activity or user focused, where as RSS is just one technology to provide the web feed. Hence, I think web feed is therefore a better term that should be used. Perhaps you can create a little orange webfeed button <img src='http://www.contentious.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> Maybe that will help it take off!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
