Comments on: Ethics, Blogging, and Journalism: The Not-So-Wild West (Part 1)

By: think again, ideascape moves people to action

think again, ideascape moves people to action — Thu, 02 Jun 2005 21:59:36 +0000

One Del.icio.us Ideascape
A week or so ago, I was exploring del.icio.us to learn what was new in the blogosphere. I usually start with my own tags (bookmarking, folksonomy, taxonomy, content management, knowledge management, idea management, enterprise blogging, innovation, etc.)

By: think again, ideascape moves people to action

think again, ideascape moves people to action — Wed, 11 May 2005 15:50:21 +0000

Blogging with Smarts and Guts
The ever generous and insightful Steve Rubel from Micro Persuasion offers the most down to earth advice for any business about who should be blogging for the company. Steve says, "

By: Anna in Calif.

Anna in Calif. — Tue, 10 May 2005 05:08:05 +0000

Hello Amy, found your blog via Chris Cobler.

“they put journalists and bloggers in the same room and encourage them to interact.”

(I wasn’t there, but…) I might reword it as follows:
“they put journalists and bloggers in the same room, at which point the journalists are no longer able to ignore the bloggers’ questions”

e.g. this comment ( and this set of additional questions) asking about the newspaper’s own ethics, particularly with reference to the editorial pages (primarily in response to this “What ethics do you expect from bloggers? / Do bloggers have ethics?” post)

And Amy (or anyone else), perhaps you could do me a big favor and clarify why questions like these don’t get answers…are they unreasonable? do you see a bad case of commenter’s halitosis? are they on the mark but an editor can’t say so? Or is it like government, where the representative only need respond to his/her own constituents?

sign me Confused in California.