headermask image

header image

Female Podcasters: Here\’s Why This Matters, Adam…

Today I’ve added a couple of new female hosted/co-hosted shows to my Women in Podcasting List. The total number of shows on that list is currently 37 podcasts, plus one videolog.

Also, I was pleased that Adam Curry, probably the world’s most popular podcaster, briefly mentioned my list in his Feb. 6 Daily Source Code show (MP3 direct download) , and included a direct link to my list in his show notes. He did this at the prompting of Kim Campbell, creator of the podcasts Shakespeare Souffle and Homeschool Habitat (both on my list).

I was a bit disappointed with the way Curry seemed dismissive of the issue of women in podcasting. Here’s what he said…

First of all, here’s Kim’s e-mail to Adam Curry:

Hi Adam,

I’m stuck at home with the flu today so I’ve been ego-surfing online to see where my podcast is listed and I found a neat link. Have you ever wondered where all the lady podcasters are? I guess Madge counts, but really, there are tons of us out there. Amy over at her blog Contentious has done us all a favor by compiling a list. That’s one thing us girls do really well, make lists. So, here’s hoping you get a minute to check out and plug some of the girlie podcasts!

– Kim C. (of Shakespeare Souffle and Homeschool Habitat)

After reading this on his show, Adam Curry said:

“I just see podcasters as podcasters, I don’t see them as male or female. We have Open Source Sex [a show] by Violet Blue… Let’s just call them all ‘biddies,’ shall we?”

OK, I’ve listened to Curry’s show for a while, so I wasn’t particularly surprised or offended by his remark. (In particular, “biddies” was a harmless in-joke referring to one of his favorite bands, The Lascivious Biddies.) And I am glad that he at least read Kim’s note and included a link to my Women in Podcasting list.

Still, I’ve gotta say it – the casual dismissiveness Curry expressed regarding women’s voices in media is exactly the problem.

True, podcasting as a medium is not about the ratio of male vs. female voices. However, in general, the notable dearth of women’s voices in media, speaking up about their own issues and perspectives, is indeed a huge issue that affects everyone. Even men. It creates a drastically skewed picture of our world, and we are all suffering repercussions from that.

In my Jan. 8 audio edition, I discussed how podcasting represents a unique opportunity to start to correct the media gender imbalance. Adam, if you’re reading this, I really wish you’d give that show a listen, and then reconsider the issue of women in podcasting.

Ironically, the initial nudge that got me thinking along these lines was because in one of the first episodes of the Daily Source Code I listened to, Adam Curry himself asked, “Where are the women?”

I know that Adam is a generally thoughtful guy – very intelligent, and not at all sexist. I also don’t assume that he should think anything is important because I or anyone else says so. He’s a very independent thinker, and I deeply respect that. Still, I’d like him to give this topic a bit more thought. I’m going to ask him to do just that.

Casual dismissiveness is surprisingly contagious and powerful. In fact, it’s a key reason why there are relatively few women’s voices in media – even more so than outright censorship, discrimination, or put-downs. Simply indicating something is a nonissue in a public forum is incredibly powerful because we’re all on information overload. Everyone already has too much to think about, learn, and care about. We’re all eagerly looking for clues and reasons to jettison items from our “need to think about this” list. The problems that spring from women lacking a proportional voice in the media are so huge and multifaceted that almost no one wants to really think about it. It challenges just about every major entrenched assumption about how our society functions and how it could/should function. The situation seems so intractable, why bother considering it?

In this case, since podcasting represents such a major, unique, new opportunity to get women’s voices heard on equal footing with men’s, I think that justifies consideration. That’s my opinion, and others disagree, but I feel strongly enough about it to keep mentioning it. In this case, I think persistence may pay off in awareness, and possibly action.

If you liked my post, feel free to subscribe to my rss feeds

8 Comments so far (Add 1 more)

  1. You mean coincidentally, not ironically. I took Adam’s comments to mean that people will be judged by the
    quality of their content, not what sex they are. Anyone can podcast, which is great.

    I’m not so happy with the biddy reference, which is usually used to put down wise older women.

    1. John on April 4th, 2005 at 4:05 pm
  2. That’s funny. Wow — I just love it that the Women in PodCasting list is growing … This is just SOOO important. I love the variety represented in the content. It’s fun to listen to the different voices & to see the variety in things like average length of podcast, etc.

    2. susan on February 16th, 2005 at 9:11 pm
  3. Thanks, Susan. And yes, I just bought that book since you mentioned it. It’s dangerous to mention cool books to me…

    - Amy Gahran

    3. Amy Gahran on February 14th, 2005 at 12:36 pm
  4. Re: the “biddies” reference — it also alludes to Chuck Palahniuk’s book, “Survivors” — “biddies” are the girl children in a doomsday cult — they are called “biddies,” which is short for individuals who have to do the bidding of the people with power (the Elders, etc.). Men fare no better — each second-born is named “Tender” — they “tend” things. Both genders are essentially servants.

    It’s interesting to me that Adam Curry would use the allusion — it definitely indicates an underlying energy of “underground cool” that seems to typify the PodCast world — a sort of antithesis of the plain vanilla “America’s garage sale & outlet store” ethos of the early e-Bay.

    All the more reason for women’s voices om PodCasting!!!! Thanks for this wonderful list –

    4. susan on February 14th, 2005 at 11:19 am
  5. Amy, I also was a little taken aback by Adam’s “I just see podcasters as podcasters” comment. It did strike me as dismissive and I was a bit saddened by that as Adam is generally a very supportive figure in podcasting and I too have heard him say the “where are the women” line. So, I felt it was out of character to be so dismissive. But, thinking on it later, I think the dismissiveness is really just an outgrowth of his maleness: the priviledged often don’t see the problems around them that are so obvious to the less priviledged and as a male who personally has no sexist agenda, doesn’t notice that there is a problem with women gaining access and control in media. Of course, ignorance, as they say, is no excuse.

    Keep up the great work Amy. I hope to make it onto your list soon and help balance the gender imbalance in podcasting.

    5. mamaloo on February 8th, 2005 at 10:26 am
  6. Woman-roar!
    There’s a blog I adore called Contentious. Amy, who runs it, also happens to be a podcaster. This past week I emailed the prince of podcasting, Adam Curry, about a list she had compiled on female podcasters. Adam, kindly…

    6. Relaxed Homeskool on February 8th, 2005 at 12:29 am
  7. Well said,Amy. I was pleased he read it and I didn’t catch any disdain in his tone, but I do think it’s a big deal that women are getting involved in this medium so early and that more should be encouraged.
    Kim C.

    7. Kim on February 7th, 2005 at 11:18 pm
  8. I really don’t think that casual dismissiveness is the problem. I agree that it is contagious and powerful, but the fact that he read Kim’s note and included a link to your Women in Podcasting list says a lot. His view of seeing “podcasters as podcasters” is excatly that…his view (and I know that you know that). I don’t think he was trying to be dismissive, at all. I think that he told us his opinion, plugged your list, and is allowing us to form our opinion.

    I do agree with you. It would be absolutely great to hear more female podcasters! The women need to choose to “make” the podcasts, though. Right now the man/woman ratio of podcasters is pretty high. You only have 37 listed on your list, out of over 2000 feeds. I don’t think Adam is the person to urge women into podcasting, though. I think you will be heading up that department. Even if he does give it more thought, he still would not have your point of view.

    8. Tom Simpson on February 7th, 2005 at 8:39 pm