<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Disagreement is Good</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.contentious.com/2005/01/05/why-disagreement-is-good/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.contentious.com/2005/01/05/why-disagreement-is-good/</link>
	<description>Amy Gahran's news and musings on how we communicate in the online age.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 07:05:35 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: View from the Isle  - Professional Blogging &#38; Blog Consulting</title>
		<link>http://www.contentious.com/2005/01/05/why-disagreement-is-good/#comment-14058</link>
		<dc:creator>View from the Isle  - Professional Blogging &#38; Blog Consulting</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Feb 2005 06:31:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-14058</guid>
		<description>&lt;trackback /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Amy's 100 bloggers submission...&lt;/strong&gt;
Amy Gahran has revealed what she is submitting to the 100 Bloggers book--Contentious &#187; My Submission to the &#8220;100 Bloggers&#8221;--her Jan 5 article ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<trackback /><strong>Amy&#8217;s 100 bloggers submission&#8230;</strong><br />
Amy Gahran has revealed what she is submitting to the 100 Bloggers book&#8211;Contentious &#187; My Submission to the &#8220;100 Bloggers&#8221;&#8211;her Jan 5 article &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff O'Hara</title>
		<link>http://www.contentious.com/2005/01/05/why-disagreement-is-good/#comment-6972</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff O'Hara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Jan 2005 15:01:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-6972</guid>
		<description>Does any one term really make some non technical term "get it", my standing is no, so it really doesn't matter what you call it.  People recognize a term by it's popularity and usage.  Look at blog or weblog, or tivo for that matter, who non-technical really new what that was about before it garnered mainstream attention, my my contention is a one single term/branding is not going to make somebody "get it".

BTW, I agree with you on many issues but here is someplace I disagree with you on.  I found out about you on yesterday's croncast and thought most of what you and kris talked about was right on.  I will now be subscribing to your feeds, thanks to croncast.
-jeff</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does any one term really make some non technical term &#8220;get it&#8221;, my standing is no, so it really doesn&#8217;t matter what you call it.  People recognize a term by it&#8217;s popularity and usage.  Look at blog or weblog, or tivo for that matter, who non-technical really new what that was about before it garnered mainstream attention, my my contention is a one single term/branding is not going to make somebody &#8220;get it&#8221;.</p>
<p>BTW, I agree with you on many issues but here is someplace I disagree with you on.  I found out about you on yesterday&#8217;s croncast and thought most of what you and kris talked about was right on.  I will now be subscribing to your feeds, thanks to croncast.<br />
-jeff</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
