<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 2. Declan McCullagh, Blog Skeptic</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.contentious.com/2004/04/16/2-declan-mccullagh-blog-skeptic/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.contentious.com/2004/04/16/2-declan-mccullagh-blog-skeptic/</link>
	<description>Amy Gahran's news and musings on how we communicate in the online age.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 17:08:57 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Cutting Through...</title>
		<link>http://www.contentious.com/2004/04/16/2-declan-mccullagh-blog-skeptic/#comment-293</link>
		<dc:creator>Cutting Through...</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-293</guid>
		<description>&lt;trackback /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;A blog sceptic view&lt;/strong&gt;
Amidst all the hype behind blogs it's refreshing when you read comments from someone who's a bit blase about it all. Amy at the Contentious Weblog is posting her transcript from a recent conference that she attended. And Declan McCullagh...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<trackback /><strong>A blog sceptic view</strong><br />
Amidst all the hype behind blogs it&#8217;s refreshing when you read comments from someone who&#8217;s a bit blase about it all. Amy at the Contentious Weblog is posting her transcript from a recent conference that she attended. And Declan McCullagh&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ripples</title>
		<link>http://www.contentious.com/2004/04/16/2-declan-mccullagh-blog-skeptic/#comment-294</link>
		<dc:creator>Ripples</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-294</guid>
		<description>&lt;trackback /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Yesterday's Experts - woefully out of touch&lt;/strong&gt;
What are they? "Yesterday's experts" are those who have risen to the top of their profession by hard work and then, satisfied by the approval of their peers, stopped learning about new things. Yet they continued making judgements about things
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<trackback /><strong>Yesterday&#8217;s Experts - woefully out of touch</strong><br />
What are they? &#8220;Yesterday&#8217;s experts&#8221; are those who have risen to the top of their profession by hard work and then, satisfied by the approval of their peers, stopped learning about new things. Yet they continued making judgements about things</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
